What these screening views show
They show statewide and selected-group staffing patterns for Connecticut facilities linked to the same CMS SNF Enrollment affiliation entity, including quarterly group averages and facility-by-facility variation.
Connecticut Affiliation View
Ownership / Affiliation Staffing Explorer
This tool groups Connecticut nursing homes by CMS SNF Enrollment affiliation entity where available, then summarizes PBJ staffing patterns across facilities connected to the same affiliation name.
Staffing, Provider Information, and SNF Enrollment affiliation fields are screening and context data. A shared affiliation entity does not by itself prove common day-to-day operations, poor care, harm, neglect, or regulatory violations.
Historical PBJ staffing among currently affiliated facilities should be interpreted as current-snapshot grouping based on the May 2026 SNF Enrollment file. This page remains focused on current affiliation context until historical affiliation snapshots are integrated.
Loading Connecticut staffing and affiliation data...
Statewide Comparison
Statewide Affiliation Staffing Comparison
Rows are grouped by CMS SNF Enrollment affiliation entity. Metrics are simple averages across Connecticut facilities in that affiliation group unless otherwise stated. CT comparison point values use PBJ-derived Connecticut direct-care screening estimates, not formal DPH compliance findings.
Shared affiliation does not prove identical operations, ownership control, or decision-making across facilities. Use this table to identify patterns and questions for review, not as a definitive chain quality ranking.
Loading statewide affiliation comparison...
Rows labeled "Small CT group" have only 1 or 2 linked Connecticut facilities, so percentage comparisons can be unstable and less generalizable.
Five-Quarter Pattern
Multi-Quarter Affiliation Pattern Summary
This compact summary covers facility-quarter patterns from 2024Q4 through 2025Q4. Missing facility-quarter rows are not treated as zero. It is a longitudinal screening summary, not a finding of cause, responsibility, or compliance.
Persistent Patterns
Affiliation Entities With Persistent Staffing Screening Patterns
This section summarizes repeated staffing screening patterns among Connecticut facilities grouped by CMS SNF Enrollment affiliation entity. It uses the same persistence concepts as the Persistent Staffing Patterns tool and does not establish chainwide operational causation, legal violations, or care-quality conclusions.
Small affiliation groups should be interpreted cautiously because one facility can drive the group share.
Loading affiliation persistent-pattern summary...
Loading affiliation persistence actions.
Clipboard access was unavailable, so the generated summary is shown here for manual copying.
Persistent patterns across multiple facilities within an affiliation may warrant closer review. Shared CMS affiliation does not prove common day-to-day management decisions. Pattern counts are based on available PBJ rows; missing rows and benchmark-ineligible quarters are not treated as adverse findings. Use facility-level and persistent-pattern drill-downs before drawing conclusions.
Affiliation Search
Choose an affiliation entity
Search CMS SNF Enrollment affiliation names. Facilities without an affiliation name are excluded from the selector but counted in the dataset summary.
Select an affiliation entity to update the group summary, trend table, and facility comparison. Loading affiliation list...
Ranking Guardrails
How to read this affiliation comparison
Compare entities with similar Connecticut facility counts cautiously, especially when one group has only 1 or 2 facilities. Use "View group" to inspect within-group variation before treating an affiliation-level average as meaningful.
For any individual nursing home, use the facility-level explorer and source context before drawing conclusions. The statewide table is designed to surface review questions, not to prove chainwide operational decisions or care quality.
Selected Group
Affiliation summary
Select an affiliation entity to use reporting actions.
Latest Quarter
Average staffing across linked Connecticut facilities
Latest-quarter averages use only facilities in the selected affiliation group with a PBJ row for that quarter.
Connecticut direct-care comparison values are PBJ-derived screening estimates using the CT 3.00 direct-care comparison point and CT 0.84 licensed comparison point. They exclude nursing administration / DON-style hours and are not formal compliance findings.
Trend Exhibit
Multi-quarter group trend
Group-quarter values are simple averages across linked Connecticut facilities with a PBJ row for that quarter. Missing facility-quarter rows are not converted to zeroes.
Facility Comparison
Linked facilities in the latest quarter
Compare facilities within the selected affiliation group for the latest quarter only, so quarters are not mixed.
Interpretation
How to read the affiliation views
What it may suggest
They may identify patterns worth closer review, such as lower or higher staffing estimates, reliance on contract staff, repeated below-comparison screening indicators, or differences among facilities connected to the same affiliation name.
What it cannot prove
They cannot prove chainwide operational decisions, common control, uniform operations, poor care, neglect, harm, or violations. These data points are best used to identify questions, then paired with resident experience, survey findings, complaints, ownership records, and other evidence.
Verification Note
Sources and limits
This static view derives affiliation groups from the generated Connecticut staffing export. It uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal staffing, CMS Nursing Home Provider Information, and CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Enrollments where available.
How the case-mix comparison is built: the case-mix comparison point value itself is not calculated by this tool. It is imported directly from the CMS Nursing Home Provider Information field "Case-Mix Total Nurse Staffing Hours per Resident per Day." CMS describes that field as case-mix total nurse staffing HPRD combining Aide + LPN + RN. This tool compares PBJ-reported actual total nurse HPRD against that CMS-published comparison point; in affiliation views, it averages available facility comparison points and calculates actual-minus-benchmark group comparisons. Case-mix and Connecticut direct-care comparison fields are contextual screening points. They do not replace actual PBJ staffing values, do not determine legal compliance, and do not prove poor care, neglect, harm, or violations.